.png)
Silvereye Election Brief | 28 October 2026
The Week at a Glance
Labour’s candidate in Tāmaki Makaurau resigned after footage showed her campaigning at an event attended by Mongrel Mob members. She will still contest the seat and says she would sit as an independent if elected. Over the weekend, photos also emerged of both party leaders and a National minister with people linked to gangs.
Opportunity’s path into government narrowed after NZ First’s leader said he could not sit at a Cabinet table with Opportunity’s leader, and National again ruled the party out.
The latest polls disagree: 1News–Verian has National ahead of Labour, 29% to 27%, while The Post–Freshwater had Labour narrowly ahead. In the Verian poll, the coalition could govern alone only if Te Pāti Māori wins just one electorate; otherwise, Opportunity holds the balance.
The result may turn on two features of MMP: whether Opportunity clears the 5% party-vote threshold, and how many extra overhang seats split voting creates. Opportunity’s average has slipped towards the threshold, and campaigns on both sides are urging voters to split their party and electorate votes.
The final policy pitches offer employers a stark choice: ACT would pause minimum wage increases and shrink government to 18 ministers, while Labour would bring back Fair Pay Agreements and create a new offence of corporate homicide.
National would ask the Commerce Commission to report on splitting up Foodstuffs, one of the country’s two big supermarket groups. NZ First would abolish the Serious Fraud Office and move its work into the Police.
Polling Snapshot
The Post–Freshwater Strategy | Reported 19 October Labour 28.7%, National 27.6%, Greens 14.3%, NZ First 11.8%, ACT 9%, Opportunity 5.4%, Te Pāti Māori 2%. On these numbers, neither the coalition nor the left bloc could govern without Opportunity. Source: RNZ via ODT, The Post
1News–Verian | Reported 20 October National 32% (+4 pp), Labour 27% (−1 pp), Greens 16% (+1 pp), ACT 11% (+1 pp), NZ First 8% (−2 pp), Opportunity 7% (−1 pp), Te Pāti Māori 0.7%. Labour is back to its 2023 election result. On 1News’ modelling, the coalition would win 60 seats, short of a majority. With Opportunity’s support, the coalition would have a majority regardless of overhang seats, while the left could form a majority if Te Pāti Māori also retained four electorate seats. Source: 1News, interest.co.nz
1News–Verian | Reported 27 October National 29% (−3 pp), Labour 27%, Greens 15% (−1 pp), ACT 12% (+1 pp), NZ First 10% (+2 pp), Opportunity 6% (−1 pp), Te Pāti Māori 0.1%. On 1News’ modelling, the coalition would win 61 seats, enough to govern if Te Pāti Māori retains only one electorate seat. If Te Pāti Māori retains four, and Te Tai Tokerau MP Mariameno Kapa-Kingi holds her seat, Parliament grows to 125 seats, the coalition falls two short and Opportunity holds the balance. Source: 1News, interest.co.nz
Across the five most recent polls, National averages 27.8% and Labour 28.7%. The governing coalition averages 48.3%, against 50.1% for Labour, the Greens, Opportunity and Te Pāti Māori combined. Labour’s average is higher than last week only because Roy Morgan’s September poll, which had Labour on 23.5%, is no longer among the five most recent.
Although the polls disagree on the major parties, neither has shifted the balance between the blocs. The latest 1News–Verian poll was taken as the gang row reached Labour, yet Labour held steady on 27%. National fell three points, but ACT and NZ First gained three between them, leaving the coalition’s combined vote unchanged at 51%. That is the shift sought by campaigns urging National supporters to give their party vote to ACT or NZ First. Opposition is also driving many votes: in The Post–Freshwater poll, 46% said they were voting mainly to stop a party or coalition from taking power.
Opportunity’s average has slipped from 6.0% to 5.4%, close to the 5% party-vote threshold, and four of the five polls put it at or below 5.5%. If it fell below the threshold, its votes would be wasted. The coalition’s lead of about three and a half points over Labour, the Greens and Te Pāti Māori would then probably be enough to govern. The Post concluded from its poll that a fraction of a percentage point could decide who governs.
Key Announcements:
1. India trade deal comes into force (government decision) The India–New Zealand free trade agreement has come into force on October 20. About 57% of New Zealand’s exports to India are now tariff-free, a share that will rise to 82% over time. Tariffs on sheep meat, wool, coal and most forestry products were removed immediately. Others will fall in stages: wine tariffs of 150% will drop to 25% or 50% over 10 years, and the tariff on mānuka honey from 66% to 16.5% over five years. The next round of cuts takes effect on 1 January 2027. Meat, wool, forestry, horticulture and wine exporters have most to gain. See: National Party.
2. National sets out 100-day plan and seniors pledges (party proposals) National’s 100-day plan lists 26 actions it would take if re-elected, most of them announced earlier. The most significant for business is a Commerce Commission report, due within six months, on options for splitting Foodstuffs into competing businesses. National would also legislate to keep council rates increases between 2% and 4% and extend paid parental leave to 27 weeks from July 2027. It would move to ban taxpayer funding for gangs. Separately, National has promised to reserve at least one in five places in the Housing Flexible Fund for seniors housing. From 1 July 2027, employers would also have to pay KiwiSaver contributions for members over 65 who are still contributing. National would ban under-16s from social media, although its coalition partners, ACT and NZ First, oppose the bill. Supermarkets, councils, employers and KiwiSaver providers are most affected. See: National Party, RNZ, interest.co.nz.
3. Labour revives Fair Pay Agreements and targets online harms (party proposals) Labour would bring back Fair Pay Agreements, raise the minimum wage in line with inflation, reverse the Government’s changes to annual leave and create a new offence of corporate homicide for workplace deaths. Its digital package would send National’s under-16 social media bill to select committee within 100 days. It would also introduce a “Digital Duty of Care”, requiring online services such as apps, games and AI chatbots to identify, assess and mitigate harms. An independent regulator would enforce the duty. In health, Labour would guarantee jobs for about 2,400 graduate nurses a year from 2027. Defence spokesperson Damien O’Connor said there was no money for the $12 billion Defence Capability Plan, which a Labour government would reassess. Employers, digital platforms and defence suppliers are most exposed. See: Labour via Scoop, interest.co.nz.
4. Greens would tax wealth and banks to fund health (party proposals) The Greens’ fiscal plan would increase health spending by $3 billion each year for four years. To help pay for it, the Greens would raise nearly $8 billion a year in new revenue. That would come from taxes on the super-rich, capital acquisitions and big corporations, a levy on the major banks, and enforcement of a tax on big tech companies. Income tax cuts would offset part of that revenue. Net core Crown debt would rise to 44% of GDP by 2030/31, and the Government’s books would return to surplus in 2029/30. Banks, large corporates, big tech and wealthy households are most exposed, while health providers stand to gain. See: 1News, RNZ, Stuff, Green Party.
5. ACT manifesto targets smaller government and constitutional change (party proposals) ACT’s manifesto would shrink government to 19 departments and 18 ministers. It promises $22 billion in savings over four years and $12.4 billion less debt by 2031 than currently forecast. Those savings would fund the removal of tax on KiwiSaver earnings. ACT would also pause annual increases to the adult minimum wage and raise the NZ Super age to 67 by 2035. On climate, ACT would repeal the Zero Carbon Act and scrap the Climate Change Commission. It would also seek to renegotiate New Zealand’s Paris commitment and withdraw if no fair deal is possible. Its constitutional agenda would add property rights to the Bill of Rights Act and end the Waitangi Tribunal’s power to hear contemporary claims. In energy, ACT would allow private investment in electricity transmission. It also pledged 10,000 charter school enrolments by 2029 and national standards to reduce the need for routine farm consents. Employers, KiwiSaver providers, energy companies and farmers are most affected. See: ACT.
6. NZ First would abolish the SFO and toughen sentences (party proposals)
NZ First would introduce degrees of murder, with life imprisonment without parole for first-degree murder and for the rape or murder of a child. It would abolish the Serious Fraud Office and transfer its work to a specialist police division. A new agency with its own minister would target transnational organised crime. A fatal “coward punch” would carry a minimum of eight years without parole. Corporate fraud enforcement and the justice sector are most affected. See: NZ First via Scoop, NewsWire, Stuff.
7. Opportunity proposes a Future Generations Commissioner (party proposal) Opportunity would create a Future Generations Commissioner: an officer of Parliament, appointed for five years, to lead a national conversation on long-term goals. The role would cost about $5 million a year and have no power to direct government. Prime Minister Christopher Luxon dismissed it as “more waffle”, while Labour leader Chris Hipkins said he was open to discussing it but deeply sceptical. See: 1News, RNZ.
Campaign Developments
Final leaders’ debate: At Tuesday’s Stuff debate, Luxon called Hipkins “without doubt the most abysmal education minister this country has ever had”, and Hipkins called the attack “petty and pathetic”. Luxon again ruled out working with Opportunity but would not say whether he would resign rather than do so. Both leaders backed a referendum on a four-year parliamentary term. Commentators called the debate a draw or a narrow win for Hipkins.
Powerbrokers’ debate: At Wednesday’s NZ Herald debate, NZ First leader Winston Peters was asked whether he could sit around a Cabinet table with Opportunity leader Qiulae Wong. “No, I can’t,” he replied. Green co-leader Marama Davidson and ACT leader David Seymour clashed over the Green and Te Pāti Māori MPs’ visit to a gang pad.
Gang row reaches Labour: Labour’s Tāmaki Makaurau candidate, Kerrin Leoni, resigned after footage showed her campaigning at a recent gathering attended by Mongrel Mob members. Hipkins, who had accepted her assurance that she had not visited a gang pad, said “campaigning alongside gangs is unacceptable”. He called the previous Labour Government’s funding of a Mob-linked rehabilitation programme a mistake. Leoni says she will stay in the race and sit as an independent if she wins. Because nominations had closed, her name remains on the ballot beside Labour’s logo, and she is still on Labour’s list.
Photo war: Mongrel Mob life member Harry Tam posted a photo of Hipkins with a man he said was a gang member. He also posted one of Luxon with Black Power members at the Crown’s 2024 apology to survivors of abuse in care. Separately, a 2024 photo emerged of minister Tama Potaka with patched Mob members at a hui organised by the Kīngitanga. Luxon said people should “not conflate” such photos with “campaigning for their vote in our National Party attire and jackets”. Labour wants the same standard applied to Potaka as its own candidates. Wong called the exchange a distraction from policy.
Opportunity: Wong said Opportunity would have “walked away” from the current coalition agreements and would not support a Treaty Principles Bill next term. She had no reservations about supporting a government that relies on overhang seats for its majority. Any coalition deal would need the backing of 75% of Opportunity’s board. Former board members have alleged a “toxic” culture, which Wong says largely predates her leadership.
Enrolment: Enrolment closed at midnight on Sunday, under the Government’s 2025 law ending enrolment during the voting period. Days before the deadline, about 92.4% of eligible voters were enrolled, compared with 94.7% at the 2023 election, and more than 300,000 were not. Labour calls the change voter suppression, while the Government says it reduces special votes and speeds up the count.
Boardroom verdict: In the NZ Herald’s Mood of the Boardroom survey, 65% of chief executives said Luxon was best placed to drive economic growth, against 3% for Hipkins. But asked whether Luxon should remain leader if the coalition is re-elected, support was 2.27 out of 5. See: 1News (RNZ), The Spinoff, 1News.
Insights & Implications
The election is now likely to be decided by two features of MMP: the 5% threshold and overhang seats. On most polls, neither bloc can reach a majority on its own, and the polls have barely moved. The outcome therefore depends on whether Opportunity clears the threshold, and on how many extra seats split voting creates. Both are harder to predict than the headline party vote, and both reward tactical voting over persuasion.
For the coalition, Opportunity is now more of an obstacle than an option. Luxon’s rule-out looks less firm than it sounds, and The Post reports that 57% of National voters want him to drop it if he needs Opportunity to govern. The bigger barrier is Peters, who said at the Herald debate that he could not sit in Cabinet with Wong. Wong says working with Peters could be a deal breaker, The Post reports. Her conditions also clash with ACT’s agenda: she will not support a Treaty Principles Bill, and she expects ACT to find her $30,000 cap on political donations hard to accept.
The coalition has two realistic paths to a majority. The first is for Opportunity to fall below 5%. Its voters lean left, with 80% telling The Post–Freshwater poll they would rather it backed Labour. That makes the voters who will decide whether Opportunity clears the threshold the most valuable in the country. If enough of them move to another party, even to Labour, Opportunity’s remaining votes would be wasted and the coalition would probably win. Labour needs them to stay where they are.
The second path is through overhang seats. These arise when a party wins more electorate seats than its share of the party vote entitles it to, and Parliament expands to accommodate them. National holds more than 40 electorates. If enough of its supporters vote for National candidates but give their party vote to ACT or NZ First, the coalition could win more seats than its party vote would justify. Both leaders called deliberately engineering an overhang “cheating” in the final debate. Yet ACT is openly courting National voters’ party votes. Newsroom also reports that a third-party promoter is distributing leaflets urging the same split. Its analysis finds that in four of the six most recent polls, the right would need an overhang of only three to seven seats to govern without Opportunity. The left would need 11 to 16 overhang seats, but can create no more than seven. Because National could win more electorate seats than its party vote entitles it to, its own list MPs are at risk too. That helps explain why National’s Paul Goldsmith is now campaigning for the Epsom electorate vote against Seymour, his coalition partner.
Labour’s own path is narrower and more costly. On 1News’ modelling, Labour needs both Opportunity’s support and four electorate wins for Te Pāti Māori. That ties Hipkins’ chances to a party at the centre of the gang row, just as the row reached his own candidates. Leoni’s decision to stay on the ballot under Labour’s logo also makes Tāmaki Makaurau harder to call. National’s attack has shifted from who Labour would govern with to whether Labour has been straight with voters. The weekend’s photos of Luxon and Potaka took some of the force out of that attack, but commentator Bryce Edwards says the left “lost control of the campaign in the last week”. Wong’s willingness to support a government that depends on overhang seats at least keeps Labour’s path open.
The final policy pitches show how different the next term could be for employers. Labour would bring back Fair Pay Agreements, raise the minimum wage in line with inflation and create a corporate homicide offence, holding organisations criminally responsible for a death caused by serious operational failures.
ACT would pause minimum wage increases and find $22 billion in savings over four years. Seymour says ACT’s next big move would be constitutional reform rather than lower taxes. Its manifesto would add property rights to the Bill of Rights Act, end the Waitangi Tribunal’s contemporary jurisdiction and repeal the Zero Carbon Act. If National agreed to those demands, the climate and Treaty settings that many businesses have planned their investment around would be reopened.
Some changes look likely whichever bloc governs. Both major parties support an under-16 social media ban, so although ACT and NZ First oppose National’s bill, it could pass with Labour’s votes. Concentrated markets also face intervention from either side. National wants a Commerce Commission report on splitting Foodstuffs, Labour would outlaw price gouging, and Opportunity wants to give the Commission the ability to break up dominant firms. For platforms, supermarkets and other dominant businesses, the question is how far intervention goes, not whether it comes. Corporate clients should also note NZ First’s plan to fold the Serious Fraud Office into the Police, where fraud investigations would compete with frontline crime for resources.
Signals to Watch
One development before polling day will indicate which side has the clearer path to a majority:
a) If Luxon says he would take Wong’s call after the election: it would signal that National is keeping open the option of a confidence-and-supply arrangement with Opportunity. Opportunity’s demands on competition, lobbying and political donations would then be in play whichever bloc leads the next government.
Looking Ahead
Thursday 29 October: 1News Kaupapa Māori Debate on TVNZ 1.
Thursday 5 November: Q+A People’s Debate, the last debate of the campaign.
Saturday 7 November: Election Day.
About Silvereye
Silvereye is a full-service public relations, corporate affairs and government relations agency. Contact us for assistance with Strategy, Submissions, Communications, Media Relations and Government and Stakeholder engagement.
Silvereye’s team can ensure that lawmakers are fully aware of your views and the outcomes you need from law changes through impactful submissions and engagement.
Messages matter. Members of our team have decades of experience and insight from their media careers and can share their expertise to make sure you are as well prepared as possible for your media moment. Reputations can be enhanced or completely lost in minutes, so don’t leave your dealings with the media to chance. Let us know, and we can set up training to suit your needs.
Keep in Touch
A lot is happening across New Zealand, its economy and political landscape. If you would like to discuss how we can help you solve your challenges or assist with getting opportunities over the line, please get in touch. Let's change the world together!
Comments